QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES
IN ADULTS LIVING WITH HIV/AIDS AT LATE STAGE, A LONGITUDINAL STUDY.
A. Hakuzimana[1],
L.E. Francis[2],
Robert.W. Burgoyne[3]
1. ABSTRACT
Changes in quality of
life and their relations to clinical findings for a number of 100 adults
with HIV/AIDS at the stage IV of infection according to WHO
classification will be assessed over 18 months. The locale of the study
is the TRAC HIV Clinic. Clinical variables (CD4 count, symptoms,
existence of antiretroviral therapy) and quality of life ratings (WHOQOLHIV
BREF) will be measured in four waves (T1, September 2004; T2, March
2005; T3, September 2005 and T4, March 2006). The Inventory of Symptoms
and Side Effects will be as well administered to subjects at the
respective waves. Then results will be compared using the version 10.0
of SPSS for data analysis.
Key words : QOL,
clinical findings, adults, advanced HIV infection
2. AIMS OF THE STUDY
The general aim of
the research is to study longitudinally the evolution of quality of life
in advanced HIV-infected patients with regard to clinical variables.
The specific aims are
:
- To
evaluate the psychometric properties of the WHOQOL-HIV BREF in Rwandan
adult HIV-infected patients at the late stage of the infection ;
- To compare
clinical variables with quality of life dimensions at the four waves ;
- To
identify contributing factors in the improvement and/or worsening of
quality of life in the patients at late stage of the HIV infection.
3. BACKGROUND AND
SIGNIFICANCE
The advent and use of new and more
effective antiretroviral drugs to control HIV infection progression,
resulting in longer survival time for HIV-infected persons (UNAIDS,
2000; Pal et al, 1998; COA, 2000) have renewed the interest of
scientists and clinicians on the quality of life in people living with
HIV/AIDS (PLWHA).
Quality of life assessment is currently
considered essential for clinical trials development (Wu, 2000) as
clinical and biological endpoints used during pharmacological trials
(CD4 level, viral load, opportunistic infections) are considered
inadequate to catch the complexity of care treatment outcomes (Weintfurtb
et al, 2000).
Quality of life is defined as “an
individual’s perception of his/her position in life in the context of
the culture and value systems in which he/she lives, and in relation to
his/her goals, expectations, standards and concerns” (WHOQOL Group,
1995).
The occurrence of symptoms namely
dyspnea, oral and abdominal pain, discomfort, malaise, weight loss,
severe headache, anorexia, vomiting, dizziness, paresthesia, fatigue,
weakness, cognitive problems and others at late stage of the HIV
infection besides financial and family problems such as stigma,
isolation, loss of income have impact on the quality of life of
HIV-infected persons.
Then, although prophylaxis and treatment
are useful, more attention should have to be taken for the better
management of symptoms abovementioned and this will facilitate the
adherence to antiretroviral therapy and to other drugs against
opportunistic infections.
4. METHODS
4.1. DESIGN OF THE STUDY
Quality of life dimensions and clinical
variables including opportunistic infections, CD4 level, symptoms will
be recorded at the 4 waves of the study period longitudinally.
The duration of the study is 18 months
from September 2004 to March 2006. At the end of every 6 months,
subjects recruited at the baseline will be interviewed by the principal
investigator, using the WHOQOL-HIV BREF and the Symptom Profile
Inventory. Clinical variables will be also handled at the same time.
Only HIV-infected adults at the 4th stage of the infection will be
accepted. Outcomes expected are grossly quality of life changes with
regard to immunologic changes compared to responsiveness to symptom
changes. These will be presented to health workers dealing with PLWHA
for behavioral changes where possible.
4.2. PARTICIPANTS
At the start of the
study, 100 adults will be recruited. Selection criteria are : stages 3
and 4 of HIV according to WHO classification of 1993, older than 14
years, willing and able to respond, resident of Kigali. Candidates will
be selected with respect to WHOQOL-HIV BREF administration.
4.3. ANALYSIS AND
STATISTICAL PLAN
The data analyses will conducted using
the Version 10.0 of Statistical Products and Service Solutions (SPSS).
The internal consistency of WHOQOL-HIV BREF domains will be assessed by
applying Cronbach’s alpha. The structure of the instrument will be
examined by evaluating the correlation between each item and the
corrected total score. Concurrent validity will be evaluated by using
the Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficients. The discriminant
validity will be examined by using one-way ANOVA. Mean values of
clinical factors (CD4 level, number of symptoms) as well as WHOQOL-HIV
BREF ratings for the total T4 follow-up study sample will be evaluated
for changes among the 4 study time-points using repeated-measures
analysis of variance (ANOVA).
4.4. TIMETABLE AND ORGANISATIONAL
STRUCTURE
P.I:
Alex HAKUZIMANA
He will coordinate the project. Also
responsible for data collection and statistical analysis will be
conducted with the mentor.
Co-investigators: Prof. L.E. FRANCIS and Robert W.BURGOYNE for
statistical analysis and possible revisions.
At each time-point, data collection by
the author and a cross-sectional analysis by the project team.
4.5. HUMAN SUBJECTS
For HIV serostatus is
confidential, informed consent will be requested for all candidates
recruited.
QUALITY OF LIFE
ASSESSMENT IN PEOPLE LIVING WITH HIV/AIDS IN THE TRAC HIV CLINIC- A
CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY.
A. Hakuzimana1, L. E.
Francis2,
Robert W. Burgoyne and K. Rupert3.
1. BACKGROUND
In recent years,
there has been more concern in the measurement of health ,beyond
traditional health indicators such mortality and morbidity (1,2), to
include measures of the impact of the disease and impairment of daily
activities and behavior (3), perceived health measures (4) and
disability/functional status measures ( 5).
These measures,
whilst beginning to provide a measure of the impact of the disease, do
not assess Quality of Life per se, which has been aptly described as the
missing measurement in health (6).
The World Health Organization defined
the Quality of Life as “the individual’s perception of their position in
life in the context of culture and value systems, in which they live and
in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns”(7) and
have been working towards devising an assessment tool that would be
accepted and applicable cross-culturally.
Focus task groups
made over the world and run by the WHO resulted in the World Health
Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) assessment instrument, a
self-reporting multidimensional measure which is composed of the
important aspects of life and covers not only physical health status
but also the psychological, social and spiritual domains of life
(8-10).
The WHOQOL contains
six domains namely physical, psychological, level of independence,
social relationship, environment and spiritual domains.
Recent analysis of
available data using structural equation modeling has shown a four
domain solution (physical, psychological, social relationship and
environment). Each domain is composed of 6-18 questions, addressing 2-4
facets. The whole questionnaire compounds 24 facets added with 4 items
relating to the overall quality of life and general health facet. In
total, the WHOQOL is composed of 100 items, which is the WHOQOL-100.
While this allows
detailed assessment of each individual facet relating to QOL, sometimes
in a practical sense it can be cumbersome, (e.g. in larger
epidemiological studies).
The WHOQOL-BREF
version was then developed in order to enable a brief but accurate
assessment of QOL in such cases (11, 12). The WHOQOL-BREF contains a
total of 26 questions, one item from each of the 24 facets contained in
the WHOQOL-100 and 2 items from the overall quality of life and general
health facet.
2. PROBLEM
DESCRIPTION
HIV disease and the
care of those living with HIV/AIDS have changed dramatically in the
recent years. People living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) may present with
multiple medical, social, and psychosocial problems concomitantly.
Psychiatric diseases, disorders of temperament or personality and
behavioral disorders have been reported in such patients .Up to 20% of
PLWHA suffer from depression at the time of their initial presentation.
A 9% incidence of mania was reported (13). Patients with HIV infection
often have character traits that are impulsive and risk-taking and this
may lead to both high-risk behaviors and non-compliance with treatment
(13).
Although the advent
and use of antiretroviral drugs have changed the deadly evolution of HIV
infection, the availability of such drugs, especially in developing
world, is obviously crucial.
Moreover, while
prophylaxis and treatment strategies are useful, difficult problems
surround items such as stigma, isolation, loss of income, pain,
fatigue, weight loss, weakness, breathing problems, cognitive problems
and others. Those have impact on the QOL of the HIV-infected persons.
Undoubtedly, the
Quality of Life of People living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) is increasingly
worsened by the course of the disease.
As the HIV infection,
for many affected individuals, becomes a chronic illness, of relapsing
and remitting nature, new challenges need to be met. The patient’s
subjective perception of several aspects of QOL is rapidly emerging as
the first goal to be pursued in HIV/AIDS clinical care (14).
The WHOQOL-BREF has
shown, from studies already done, the accuracy and relevancy of its
psychometric properties i.e. internal consistency, test-retest
reliability and discriminant validity (15-18).
3. HYPOTHESIS
STATEMENT
The hypothesis to
test is “The Quality of Life is negatively affected in HIV patients”.
4. OBJECTIVES
4. I. General objective:
To assess the Quality
of Life in people living with HIV/AIDS in the TRAC HIV Clinic/ Kigali.
4.2.
Specific objectives
- To evaluate the WHOQOL- BREF
properties in a Rwandan HIV-positive and HIV-negative population ;
- To identify and compare
contributing factors for poor QOL in the HIV-positive versus
HIV-negative persons.
5. METHODS
AND MATERIALS
5.1. WHOQOL
BREF
The WHOQOL
BREF was used in this study.. This questionnaire comprises 26 questions
whose one item is from each of the 24 facets contained in the
WHOQOL-100, and two items one for the overall quality of life and
another for the general health facet.
5.2. DESIGN
AND LOCALE OF THE STUDY
Cross-sectional and analytical.
The study
will be carried out in the TRAC HIV Clinic/Kigali.
5.3.
SUBJECTS
With respect
to the administration of the WHOQOL BREF, the sample size will be 300
(19).
Sampling
quota:
-
Age: 50 % will be between 15 and 36 years, 50 % older than 35 years.
-
Sex: 50 % will be male and 50 % will be female.
-
Health status: 250 HIV positive and 50 HIV negative.
Within the
ill persons a cross-section of people with varied levels of QOL will be
defined with regard to WHO classification (20): a number of 62, 62, 63
and 63 for the first, second, third and fourth stages respectively.
The category
of seronegative persons will be assembled randomly from the people
tested in the Treatment and Research AIDS Centre (TRAC) with group
stratification.
5.4.
METHODOLOGY OF INTERVIEW
Before the
interview starts, the author explained the reasons of the survey and the
atmosphere of cooperation.
5.5.
CONFIDENTIALITY AND ETHICS OF THE RESEARCH
Since HIV
serostatus is confidential, informed consent will be requested for all
candidates completing the WHOQOL BREF.
5.6. SCORING
AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS (19)
In order to
make domain scores comparable with ones of WHOQOL-100 as stipulated by
the rules regarding the WHOQOL use, mean scores will be multiplied by 4.
Where more
than 20 % will be missing, the assessment will be discarded.
Where one
item will be missing, the mean of other items in the domain will be
substituted.
Where more
than 2 items are missing from the domain, the domain will not be
calculated. In domain three, the domain will be calculated if ≤ 1 item
is missing.
Internal
consistency will be assessed by using Cronbach alpha. Test-retest
reliability with a two-week interval will be assesses by Pearson
correlation coefficient. Discriminant validity will be determined via
t-test for sex, age and health status.
The SPSS
syntax will be used to check recode data and compute domain scores.
The SPSS
software package will be used for data management and statistical
analysis.
6.
BENEFICIARIES
The
beneficiaries are divided into two groups: the first group is people
living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) and the second are health professionals and
health workers caring for.
7. REFERENCES
-
World
Bank. World Development Report : Investing in Health. New York :
Oxford University Press. 1993.
-
World
Health Organization. World Health Statistics Annual. Geneva : WHO.
1991.
-
Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB et al. The
Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health
status measure. Medical Care. 787-805; 19. 1981.
-
Hunt
SM, Mckenna SP, and McEwan J. The Nottingham Health Profile. Users
manual. Revised edition. 1989.
-
Ware
JE, Snow K, Konsiski M and Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey : Manual
and Interpretation Guide. New England Medical Centre. MA, USA.
1993.
-
Fallowfield L. The Quality of Life : The Missing Measurement in
Health Care. Souvenir Press. 1990.
-
World
Health Organization. WHOQOL Study Protocol. WHO (MNH/PSF/93.9).
Geneva : WHO. 1993.
-
Orley
J, Kuyken W. Quality of Life assessment : international
perspectives. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 1994.
-
The
WHOQOL Group. Development of the WHOQOL: Rationale and current
status. Int JMental Health. 20-35; 23. 1994.
-
Szabo
S on behalf of the WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization
Quality of Life (WHOQOL) assessment instrument. In: Spilker A,
editor. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials.
2nd ed. Philadelphia and New York: Kippincott-Raven Publishers.
355-62. 1996.
-
Berwick DM, Murphy JM, Goldman PA, Ware JE, Barsky
AJ, Weinstein MC. Performance on a five-item mental health
screening test. Medical Care. 169-76; 29. 1991.
-
The
WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization
WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life assessment. Psychological Medicine.
551-8; 28. 1998.
-
Bartlett JG and Gallant GE. 2003 Medical Management of HIV
infection. Hopkins Publications. 2003.
-
Starace F et al. Quality of Life assessment in HIV-seropositive
persons: application and validation of the WHOQOL-HIV, Italian
version. AIDS care. 405-15, 14. 2002.
-
Dazord A, Gerin P and Boizel JP. Subjective Quality of Life
assessment in therapeutic trials: presentation of a new instrument
in France (SQLP: Subjective Quality of Life Profile) and first
results. In: Orley J, Kuyken W (Eds). Quality of Life assessment:
international perspectives, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
1994.
-
Sung KM et al. Development of the Korean
Versions of WHO Quality of Life Scale and WHOQOL-BREF. 2001.
-
Australian Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health. About Australian
WHOQOL-Bref contents.
http://www.acpmh.unimelb.edu.au/whoqol/whoqol-bref-contents.html.
Visited on April 12, 2004.
-
De Girolamo G et al. La valutazione della qualita
della vita: validazione del WHOQOL-Breve. Epidemiologica e
Psichiatria Sociale. 45-55, 9. 2000.
19. World Health Organization.
Programme on Mental Health. WHOQOL-BREF:
Introduction,
administration, scoring, and generic version of the assessment.
Field trial version. Geneva.
December 1996.
20. The Different Stages of HIV
Infection.
http://www.avert.org/hivstages.htm.
Visited on May 16th, 2004.
THE
RWANDA QUALITY OF LIFE CENTRE PROJECT
PLAN
Project name: QOL
assessment in Rwanda
Name of the
organisation: Rwanda Quality of Life Centre
Address: Kigali City,
Rwanda
P O
Box 6471
Phone
: + 250 08570008
Email : alexqol@yahoo.co.uk.
Location: Nationwide
Duration: 12 months
initially
Objective: Promote
quality of life of Rwandese in general and of chronically ill people in
particular by disseminating information about quality of life throughout
the country, the region, the continent and across the world and
enhancing quality of life research.
Activities: -
Translating QOL instruments from foreign languages into Kinyarwanda ;
-
Carrying out studies on QOL assessment of domains relevant to
chronic
diseases especially HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, diabetes, etc.
-
Training young investigators on QOL issues by holding workshops,
seminars,
lectures, TV and radio broadcasts.
Beneficiaries:
Rwandese society especially chronically ill people and most
particularly
people living with HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria.
Implementing agent:
Rwanda QOL Centre
Submitting agency:
Rwanda QOL Centre
Funding agency:
Amount requested:
57,800,000.00 RWF (101,403.49 US Dollars)
State of project: The
Rwanda QOL Centre is an innovative not for profit and independent
organisation of volunteers willing to help society promote their QOL.
Support is
needed for the launching, contribution and then continuation of its
valuable
activities.
Partners: WHOQOL
Group, National University of Rwanda, MAPI Research Trust,
University of Toronto, ISOQOL, ISPOR, Lux Development Project, Ministry
of
Health, Ministry of Education, Sciences and Technology, University
Central
Hospital of Kigali, Treatment and Research AIDS Center (TRAC).
I.
NEEDS STATEMENT
Quality of life is
defined as individuals’ perceptions of their position in life in the
context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in
relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concern.
It is a widely
ranging concept incorporating in a complex way the persons’ physical
health, psychological state, level of independence, social relationship,
personal beliefs and their relationships to features of the environment.
This definition
reflects the view that quality of life is a subjective evaluation which
is to be considered in the cultural, social and environmental context.
Therefore, quality of
life is not equal to « health status », « life style », « life
satisfaction » or « well-being ».
The recognition of
this multi-dimensional nature of quality of life is reflected in the
World Health Organisation Quality of Life structure.
This is organised
into six broad domains of quality of life i.e. physical, psychological,
level of independence, social relationships, environment and
spirituality/religion/personal beliefs.
The initiative of the
World Health Organisation to develop a quality of life assessment arose
for three major reasons.
First, measures in
use such as Sickness Impact Profile, Nottingham Health Profile, Medical
Outcomes Study SF-36, etc although providing a measure of the impact of
disease do not assess QOL per se, which has been aptly described as the
missing measurement in health.
Second, most measures
of health status have been developed in North America and United
Kingdom, and their translation for use in other settings is
time-consuming, and unsatisfactory for a set of reasons.
Third, the
increasingly mechanistic model of medicine, concerned only with the
eradication of disease and symptoms, reinforces the need for the
introduction of a humanistic element into health care.
By calling for QOL
assessments in health care, attention is focused on this aspect of
health, and resulting interventions will pay increased attention to this
aspect of patients’ well-being.
WHO’s initiative to
develop a QOL assessment arises from a need for genuinely international
measure of QOL and a commitment to the continued promotion of an
holistic approach to health and health care.
With regard to the
scope of the problem, a group of young Rwandese investigators in
collaboration with other experts and organisations from abroad and with
a close link to the WHOQOL Group has decided to create and launch the
Rwanda Quality of Life Centre, in abbrevation RWQOL.
The mission of the
organisation is to promote quality of life of Rwandese in general and of
ill chronically people in particular by disseminating information about
quality of life (QOL) across the country, the region, the continent and
over the world and to enhance research in quality of life.
II.GOALS AND
OBJECTIVES
1) The first
objective of the project is translation and back-translation of the
instruments of the WHO for assessment of the QOL: WHOQOLBREF,
WHOQOL-HIVBREF, WHOQOL-100 and WHOQOL-HIV module items into Rwandese
version, and review of the back-translated items by the WHO/MNH.
2) The second
objective is to carry out two substudies to test the WHOQOL instruments,
short forms :
- the first
is to recruit and interview a sample of 300 individuals comprising 250
HIV-infected and 50 well persons. The instrument to test is the
WHOQOLBREF. All instructions regarding its use will be respected.
- the second
sub-study is to recruit a cohort of 174 adult HI-infected subjects on
antiretroviral therapy. Changes in QOL perceptions and their relations
to clinical status will be assessed over a 18-month period. Clinical
variables and QOL (WHOQOL-HIV BREF) ratings will be measured in four
waves with the interval time of 6 months. Here the instrument to test is
the WHOQOL-HIV BREF.
The two substudies
will be conducted in the City of Kigali, Capital of Rwanda.
3) The third
objective is to train investigators of the region on QOL issues by
holding workshops, seminars, lectures, TV and radio broadcasts and by
participating in the international conferences and meetings.
4) The fourth
objective is the development of website “Rwanda QOL Centre”. Web
information would make the findings available for health care
professionals.
The website will
assist in disseminating project results not only in Rwanda but also in
the countries of the Eastern and Central Africa, the closest in
mentality and common culture.
It could be
interesting for physicians, including infectious diseases specialists,
medical doctors, psychologists, public health managers, representatives
of public health care and researchers, and all those whose work is
related to the social protection of these groups of the population.
We should stress on
the on-going of studies with specific diseases, besides HIV/AIDS, such
as tuberculosis, malaria, diabetes, asthma, hypertension, psychological
and physical trauma, etc.
5) The fifth
objective is creation and publication of the manual on the QOL
instruments: the Rwandese version which is extremely useful for Rwandese
researchers who are interested in the area of the investigation on QOL.
The project staff in Rwanda has to receive the permission from the
authors of the instruments to publish them in national language.
This manual will
enable Rwandese scientists to continue their efforts in QOL research of
different groups of patients.
III.METHODOLOGY AND
TIMETABLE
The Principal
Investigator of the project is Alex HAKUZIMANA, the President and the
Co-founder of the Rwanda QOL Centre.
A. The facet
definitions and questions of the WHOQOL instruments will be translated
into colloquial Rwandese (Kinyarwanda) by two psychiatrists and one
clinical psychologist. Then four high school graduates will review the
translated WHOQOL instruments and highlight sections difficult to
understand. These words and sentence structures will be modified and the
Rwandese version back-translated into English by a bilingual
psychologist.
This version will be
sent to the WHO, and final correction will be made according to the
WHOQOL group instructions.
The final Rwandese
versions are expected to be available after a period of 4 months but the
short forms will be handled in one month.
The study of the
validation of the WHOQOLBREF is cross-sectional and analytical. With
respect to the administration of the WHOQOLBREF, sampling quota will be
taken into account. Scoring and statistical analysis will respect the
rules regarding the WHOQOL use. Results are expected after 2 months ie 3
months since the start of the
project.
The second sub-study
with use of the WHOQOL-HIV BREF is longitudinal and analytical.
The duration is 18
months. The questionnaire will be administered to HIV-infected subjects
at every time interval of 6 months, the first being done before
antiretroviral commences. Simultaneously, clinical variables (CD4,
opportunistic infections and malignancies, viral load, staging and so
forth) will be recorded. At every wave, data will be analysed and at
the end of the study period study, a global analysis with regard to
results of the four time-points will be done.
Professor Francis
Edmond LAMBERT of the University Central Hospital of Kigali has accepted
to act as the consultant, Robert BURGOYNE as statistician and Kaul
RUPERT as consultant of the University of Toronto. Further experts in
QOL research are being contacted for the best on-going of the studies
especially members of the International Society for Quality of Life
Research (ISOQOL), the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and
Outcomes Research (ISPOR), the MAPI Research Trust and the Cochrane
Health-Related Quality of Life Methods Group.
The Principal
Investigator, Alex HAKUZIMANA, will coordinate the project and is
responsible of other tasks (selection of the study participants, study
procedures, enrollment, interview, ethics, data collection, reporting,
etc) under auspices of the WHOQOL Group and in close collaboration of
the RWQOL.
B. Training on
QOL issues will start by the first year of the project. At least 3
workshops or seminars or conferences are scheduled. The PI has a prior
invitation to the ISOQOL Annual Meeting to be held in Hong Kong on 16-19
October 2004. Two others would be held in Rwanda.
C. The
development of website RWQOL is in the hand of the webmaster, a member
of the Executive Committee of the Centre. His duties are well explained
in the Constitution and Bylaws.
D. The manual
« QOL instruments » in Rwandese version will be set up by an editing
committee under the direction of the Executive Committee of the Centre.
The first publication
is expected to appear by the end of six months with reference to the
start of the project.
IV. EVALUATION
A set of experts in
QOL and an advisory committee will be called upon for the evaluation of
the project. The advisory committee should be set up from the project’s
beginning to monitor and guide its development. Reports will be handled
over to our partners at every three months.
V. ORGANISATIONAL
CAPACITY
The Rwanda QOL Centre
needs manpower for the better management of its activities. These
manpower needs include its willing membership and psychologists.
VI. FUTURE FUNDING
RESOURCES
At the end of one
year of work, Rwanda Quality of Life Centre will have its seat, office
materials, and transport facilities if funds are available. For we
assure that initial activities will attain their success, new partners
and funders with regard to pathology to evaluate are expected to
support the Centre.
Several intensive
contacts will be made during this first year so that we find almost
permanent funders and the government officials through the Ministries of
Education and of Health have accepted to adhere to our activities.
Emphasis should be done to international organisations such as MAPI
RESEARCH TRUST and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA).
We hope to work with high educational institutions particularly
University of Toronto (Canada), National University of Rwanda and the
University of Bath (United Kingdom), Liverpool School of Tropical
Medicine (UK).